In the last week, millions of people across the UK and Northern Scandinavia were lucky enough to witness one of the great cosmic phenomena that our planet can offer us: a total solar eclipse. Occurring when the Moon passes between the Earth and the Sun, thus obscuring our vision of the latter, a total eclipse is rare event which many of us might only experience two or three times in a whole lifetime. With the previous couple occurring in 1961 and 1999, and the next not due until 2090, eclipses are truly remarkable events which remind us of the sheer enormity of our solar system, and the true majesty of our natural world.
Although (thankfully) not as rare, superb wine vintages are also indicative of the invisible hand of Mother Nature: ideal growing conditions and dedicated winemakers working in tandem to produce wines of sheer delight and infinite superlatives. I'm talking here about the really great vintages: 1963 Port, 1996 Champagne, 2009 Bordeaux and the like. A recent vintage which has aroused great excitement in the wine world is the 2010 Barolos. Known as 'Il Re dei Vini' (The King of Wines), Barolo is considered by many to be Italy's greatest vinous offering, producing pure Nebbiolo-based wines which combine power, elegance and ultimately unrivalled satisfaction. So when those in the know begin to murmur of stellar vintages, the rest of us should sit up and take notice. In Decanter's recent panel tasting of 2010 Barolos, Michael Garner commented on the "tremendous" wines, saying that he considered the high praise garnered by the vintage to be justified. Garner's fellow taster and Italian wine expert Emily O'Hare also extolled the vintage's virtues:
"If ever there was a vintage to draw in new fans to Nebbiolo [...], then 2010 is the year: these Barolos are transparent and bright in colour, with complex aromas that are floral, exuberantly fruity and exotically spicy, with base notes of fresh meat".
Perhaps most tellingly, renowned wine expert Robert Parker scored the vintage an 'Extraordinary' 98 points in August 2014. Parker's high marks are hard won (for context, the fabulous 2011 Ports only merited 95) so things really do look promising for the 2010s that are starting to hit the shelves.
So it is this context in which I tried the Tesco Finest Barolo 2010 - the supermarket's own brand flagship Barolo (and reasonably priced at a discounted £12.37 - RRP £14.99). Previous vintages fared well with the critics: of the 2005, David Williams remarked: "It's powerful and full of dark fruit but it also has a hint of the haunting floral notes that make Barolo so special" (http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2010/aug/15/supermarket-own-brand-wine). Olly Smith heaped similar praise on the 2008, calling it "a great intro to Barolo with aromas of truffle and rosé" (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article-2236824/OLLY-SMITH-Time-roll-Barolo.html). Of the current 2010 bottle, the Sunday Times' Damian Barr remarked that the wine was "pleasingly spicy", whilst author of 'The Best Wines in the Supermarkets' Ned Halley noted the "exotic spirity-sappy nose [and] lashings of typical sleek fruit".
Like the critics mentioned above, I also found Tesco's Barolo to be a great introduction to both the Barolo style and the Nebbiolo grape. Even in its infancy, the 2010 shows signs of age: its translucent garnet hue just going tawny at the rim. On the nose are those typical aromas of ripe cherry, hints of blackcurrant and a suggestion of oakiness from the time the wine spent in the barrel. The red cherries on the nose are carried through to the palate, where they are joined by savoury notes of nutskin. The structure of the wine is exemplary: good weight and texture, with eager tannins and customary bitterness and acidity. Overall, I found the Finest Barolo to be a refined wine, which would be a great starting point for newcomers to the style. Yes, the fruits are a little one dimensional, but the suggested four year storage period in the bottle should see more complex flavours start to evolve.
So, a good mainstream effort from Tesco in what looks like it could be one of the vintages of the century. In fact, the only danger to the King of Wine's crown is that other 2010 wines could prove to eclipse it: Bordeaux, Burgundy, Chianti Classico and Rioja all had superb growing seasons. In the meantime, let us rejoice in the promise and excellence that the 2010 Barolos represent. Hopefully we'll be treated to a few more like it before 2090 too.
An informal wine blog with thoughts and opinions on all things vinous! Tweet: @TomOnWine
Tuesday, 24 March 2015
Thursday, 12 March 2015
Oxford Landing Estates review - Tesco Wine
This is an abridged version of a review I wrote for Tesco Wine after being selected as Member of the Month for March 2015 (the original can be found here: http://www.tescowinecommunity.com/blog/member-of-the-month-tomonwine.html). The review was for a mixed case of six wines from Oxford Landing Estates in South Australia.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
March Member of the Month – TomOnWine
So,
to business! The case I was asked to review was the Oxford Landing Mixed Case, which consists of the Australian producer’s
Chardonnay, Viognier, Sauvignon Blanc and Cabernet Sauvignon, as well as two
bottles of their Merlot. Set on the banks of the Murray River in South
Australia, Oxford Landing Estates comprises a vast 650 acres of vines, which
are split into five 130 acre sites and managed on a ‘small vineyard’ basis.
Keen to stress this approach, Oxford Landing also prides itself on
sustainability, and focuses on ecological irrigation methods and a respect for
the natural environment. Headed up by their chief winemaker, Andy La Nauze
(aptly named: his surname is pronounced ‘nose’), the Estate today produces a
wide range of varietal wines which are exported globally. Below you’ll find my
review of the Mixed Case wines, which I have analysed in depth and in
comparison with each other. I’ve also included my thoughts on food matching,
and have endeavoured to be as fair and objective as possible in my comments. I
hope you enjoy!
Merlot, 2012, 13.5%
Merlot
isn’t a grape often associated with Australia, and is rarely seen on its own as
a varietal wine. It is, however, the country’s third-most widely planted red
variety after Syrah and Cabernet Sauvignon, and as a consumer of European Merlots
I was very interested to see how this Australian effort could compare. I’m
pleased to announce that it fared very well indeed. Oxford Landing’s Merlot is
a deep ruby red in colour, with a nose of squashy red fruits and plums. There’s
also a bit of sweet spice lingering (oak treatment?) which I think will appeal
to Rioja lovers. On the palate, the smooth, well-integrated tannins carry the
plum and blackcurrant fruits well, finishing in a further suggestion of
cinnamon sweetness. I would recommend drinking this medium-bodied Merlot with a
good piece of sirloin steak, although it would also sit very nicely alongside
tomato-based dishes.
Cabernet Sauvignon-Shiraz,
2012, 13.5%
Unlike
Merlot, the blend of Cabernet Sauvignon and Shiraz (or Syrah, to give it its
rightful name) is bona fide Australian.
Both of these thick-skinned, tannic grapes are French in origin, but it was our
Antipodean friends who pioneered the blending of the two, which – when done
well – can produce wines of great structure and ageing capability. That
certainly was the first thought in my mind when I tried Oxford Landing’s
version: it has the tannic structure and depth of fruit to age comfortably in
the bottle for the next 3-5 years. Like the Merlot, it is deep ruby red in
colour and just starting to turn garnet at the rim. On the nose, the
combination of the grapes is evident: the fresh white pepper is typical of
Shiraz, while the blackcurrant and savoury spice notes betray the Cab in the
blend. On the palate are notes of black fruits and pepper which pique your
tastebuds, all wrapped in a comforting blanket of dark chocolate. For a food match,
barbecued red meat seems a cliché, but this really is a wine that requires a
lot of protein to mop up all that tannin.
So
which red to plump for? Both wines are well-balanced, easy to drink and from a
good 2012 vintage in South Australia, but it is the Cab-Shiraz blend which is
easier to pick out as Australian: the Merlot has an elegant quality that you
could easily pass off as European. The Merlot is slightly more refined too,
with its duskier, shy fruits; while the Cab has a more eager, fresher quality,
and possibly more potential to age. Overall, I think it would come down to
personal taste, as both are quality wines that would sit happily alongside their
Old World counterparts. Here’s to Aussie reds!
Sauvignon Blanc, 2014, 10.5%
At
just 10.5% abv, the Sauvignon Blanc was the lightest wine I tasted from the
Oxford Landing Estates case in terms of alcohol, but that certainly didn’t stop
the wine from packing a big punch! I’m usually a fan of the heavier, fuller
styles of white wine (think Chablis and oaked white Rioja), so I was somewhat
surprised that I found myself lavishing praise on what is a light-bodied,
mineral Sauvignon Blanc. The wine is a light pale gold, although not as
translucent as Old World examples of the same grape. The nose is heavily
perfumed, and filled with decadent fruits (white peach, honeydew melon) as well
as the customary Sauvignon grassy twang. On the saline-laced palate are more
white fruits like melon, pear and crunchy green apples; all of which are held together
by a sumptuous mouthwatering acidity. This is a wine that fully deserves to be
enjoyed in its entirety, so if you’ve not got some pan-fried white fish or
lemon couscous salad close to hand, don’t hesitate to slurp away happily on it
as an apéritif – it’s really rather good.
Chardonnay, 2013, 13.5%
Unfortunately
for this most noble of white varieties of Burgundian origin, the
anti-Chardonnay mob have, in recent times, been rather successful at heaping
negative press upon this poor grape. Of course, those who shun Chardonnay are
really reacting to the oak-laden, heavy alcohol styles of white wine which rose
to prominence in the late Nineties and early Noughties, in favour of lighter,
crisper wines like the Sauvignon Blanc above. In reality, do a quick survey of occasional
wine drinkers and you’ll be surprised at the number who are shocked to learn
that their detested Chardonnay is actually responsible for Chablis and some of
the other great French wines. However, if you are trying to wean your
anti-Chardonnay friends back onto the stuff, I would suggest picking something
other than this 13.5% abv Oxford Landing version. That’s not to say this wine
is not worth your while; quite to the contrary: this is an expressive
Chardonnay that will reward those who give it a fair crack. On the nose are
aromas of roasted peaches, which are consistent through to the palate, where
they are joined by a slight creaminess and some nectarine/mandarin notes on the
finish. The good balance of acidity and texture in the wine, coupled with those
fruity notes, means that this would be delightful with mango chicken dishes. For
me, Oxford Landing have succeeded at striking the delicate balance between the
fruit-forward, full New World styles and the classical, clean European take on
France’s finest white grape. Give it a go – I promise you won’t regret it!
Viognier, 2014, 13.1%
Alternatively, if you’re
growing weary of your Chardonnay and fancy expanding your vinous horizons, then
a good grape to opt for is Viognier. Although up until as recently as 1980
where all the world’s plantings of Viognier consisted of 57 acres in northern
Rhône, time has seen the grape’s popularity increase drastically, and the grape
is today found in many of the world’s wine regions including California,
Argentina, Chile and New Zealand, as well as South Australia like the bottle we
are tasting here. It can, however, be a difficult grape for winemakers to
handle: its low yielding vines mean it is not the most economical grape in
existence, and its sensitivity to oxidation requires skilful handling on the
winemaker’s part. When done well, however, Viognier combines the lush full texture
of Chardonnay with the delicate aromatics associated with grapes like Muscat
and Gewürztraminer. This Oxford Landing bottle is a good example of what
Viognier can offer: a medium/full-bodied wine with spicy, herbal aromas of
dried mint and canned green olives. On the palate are more vegetal notes
(yellow bell pepper came to my mind) which mingle alongside roasted apricot and
sharp gooseberry. The Oxford Landing Viognier may well present itself to be a
polarising wine, but its intriguing flavours and strong versatility with food
mean that it’s a wine that fans of the grape should not pass up on.
For fans of white wines,
the Oxford Landing Estates case really does offer something for everyone. I was
impressed with the adherence to typicity on show (grassy Sauvignon, expressive
Chardonnay, captivating Viognier) but I was equally taken with the wines’
faithfulness to their New World home: I think most wine enthusiasts would be
able to pick these three out as Australian. In terms of personal preference, I
would really struggle to choose a clear winner as all three wines stick to what
they know and do it very well. If pushed though, I would probably opt for that
mouthwatering Sauvignon Blanc: the combination of European classicality and
opulent Aussie fruit is hard to resist. But for everyone else, I can only urge
you to snap up this case and pick your own favourite. You really can’t go
wrong!
What a great set of wines!
I thoroughly enjoyed tasting all of these bottles, each with their different
assets and nuances; and I don’t think I’ve ever tried a case of wine which was
so quintessentially Australian in nature, but at the same time decidedly European
in its wines’ poise and classicality. Whether you’re a fan of punchy,
structured, fruit-filled reds or diverse, elegant, flavoursome whites, there’s
really very little – in my view – to stop you thoroughly enjoying this Oxford
Landing mixed case.
Monday, 9 March 2015
Appellation exploration
Since the turn of the year, I've noticed that I've started to become a bit more daring in my choice of wine regions. Having recently carried out an in-depth tasting of wines from the Riverland region in South Australia, it got me thinking of the other lesser-known areas under vine from which I've sampled wines in the recent past. Notable examples include a gorgeous southern French red from Latour de France AOC, a zippy Spanish Godello from DO Monterrei, as well as a liquor-laden Touriga Nacional from Portugal's Alentejo wine region. And that's not to mention some of the bottles I've got stashed away for future enjoyment (a Rothschild Cabernet Sauvignon from Chile's Colchagua Valley anyone?). I guess it's inevitable that lovers of wine will always want to explore and, as the palate develops, seek out new and exciting styles from the more unfamiliar of the world's many growing regions.
One wine region which certainly won't be unknown to any oenophile worth their salt is Bordeaux. An area steeped in history, wine has been produced in Bordeaux since Roman times in the 1st Century AD, and is today universally considered to be the fine wine region of our planet. However, although it is known as an area for the Châteaux Lafites and Margaux of this world, Bordeaux is also a producer of vast amounts of inexpensive, reasonable quality red wine, made in an accessible style by the region's Châteaux and négociants in some of the lesser appellations. One such appellation is the recently created Côtes de Bordeaux, which came into existence in October 2009 and united the previous appellations of Blaye, Francs, Castillon and Cadillac. The umbrella appellation covers an area of 11,000 hectares and is responsible for 10% of the production from the entire Bordeaux region. Aimed at increasing brand awareness in export markets, Côtes de Bordeaux is intended to represent a step up in quality from the basic Bordeaux AOC label and permits each sub-appellation to be named on the bottle, as well as allowing blending from across all four.
The wine I'm reviewing here is an example of a blend from across the sub-appellations, and as it was from the 2009 growing season, it represents the first vintage to don the Côtes de Bordeaux AOC designation. It's the Château Deville Côtes de Bordeaux 2009, purchased from Bacchus Wines, Olney at £9.95 (www.bacchus.co.uk). The winemaker Jean-Paul Deville is actually better known for his range of eponymous Champagnes, but since the mid-Eighties his estate has also been involved in Bordeaux, where it produces a white Entre-Deux-Mers and a rosé, as well as the red Côtes de Bordeaux tasted here. A Merlot-dominated blend, the wine is a mid-intensity ruby in appearance, just showing its age and fading to garnet at the rim. The nose is classic Bordeaux, and evokes the essence of the complex aromas of great old vintages from the region: slightly dusky and sultry, with prunes, plums and a dash of black pepper. The fruit on the palate is a little brighter (ripe plums and fresh nectarine) and gives the wine an accessible, fresh feel. The wine's tannins are well-integrated, and coupled with the medium body and decent weight, they go together to create a smooth and supple Claret. I'd be perfectly happy to spend an evening with the wine by itself, but it would also show well with the mellow, meaty flavours of a slow-cooked beef bourguignon.
On the whole, I thought the Château Deville was a good value wine which really showed what the lesser appellations of the most famous of French regions can do: that is, to provide 90% of the character of the Bordeaux First Growths at a fraction of the price. Of course, the Château Deville showed no complex secondary aromatics, nor did it provide the sort of lingering finish that persists for five minutes, but then you wouldn't expect it to at just shy of ten pounds. What you do get with this wine is a very good quaffer which would be an excellent introduction to anyone looking to understand the ethos and spirit of the wines of Bordeaux. Aside from anything else, the Château Deville Côtes de Bordeaux really goes to show the benefits of exploring different wine regions, even those which you thought you knew inside out. I, for one, will certainly be keeping an eye out for more wines from this up-and-coming appellation in the future.
One wine region which certainly won't be unknown to any oenophile worth their salt is Bordeaux. An area steeped in history, wine has been produced in Bordeaux since Roman times in the 1st Century AD, and is today universally considered to be the fine wine region of our planet. However, although it is known as an area for the Châteaux Lafites and Margaux of this world, Bordeaux is also a producer of vast amounts of inexpensive, reasonable quality red wine, made in an accessible style by the region's Châteaux and négociants in some of the lesser appellations. One such appellation is the recently created Côtes de Bordeaux, which came into existence in October 2009 and united the previous appellations of Blaye, Francs, Castillon and Cadillac. The umbrella appellation covers an area of 11,000 hectares and is responsible for 10% of the production from the entire Bordeaux region. Aimed at increasing brand awareness in export markets, Côtes de Bordeaux is intended to represent a step up in quality from the basic Bordeaux AOC label and permits each sub-appellation to be named on the bottle, as well as allowing blending from across all four.
The wine I'm reviewing here is an example of a blend from across the sub-appellations, and as it was from the 2009 growing season, it represents the first vintage to don the Côtes de Bordeaux AOC designation. It's the Château Deville Côtes de Bordeaux 2009, purchased from Bacchus Wines, Olney at £9.95 (www.bacchus.co.uk). The winemaker Jean-Paul Deville is actually better known for his range of eponymous Champagnes, but since the mid-Eighties his estate has also been involved in Bordeaux, where it produces a white Entre-Deux-Mers and a rosé, as well as the red Côtes de Bordeaux tasted here. A Merlot-dominated blend, the wine is a mid-intensity ruby in appearance, just showing its age and fading to garnet at the rim. The nose is classic Bordeaux, and evokes the essence of the complex aromas of great old vintages from the region: slightly dusky and sultry, with prunes, plums and a dash of black pepper. The fruit on the palate is a little brighter (ripe plums and fresh nectarine) and gives the wine an accessible, fresh feel. The wine's tannins are well-integrated, and coupled with the medium body and decent weight, they go together to create a smooth and supple Claret. I'd be perfectly happy to spend an evening with the wine by itself, but it would also show well with the mellow, meaty flavours of a slow-cooked beef bourguignon.
On the whole, I thought the Château Deville was a good value wine which really showed what the lesser appellations of the most famous of French regions can do: that is, to provide 90% of the character of the Bordeaux First Growths at a fraction of the price. Of course, the Château Deville showed no complex secondary aromatics, nor did it provide the sort of lingering finish that persists for five minutes, but then you wouldn't expect it to at just shy of ten pounds. What you do get with this wine is a very good quaffer which would be an excellent introduction to anyone looking to understand the ethos and spirit of the wines of Bordeaux. Aside from anything else, the Château Deville Côtes de Bordeaux really goes to show the benefits of exploring different wine regions, even those which you thought you knew inside out. I, for one, will certainly be keeping an eye out for more wines from this up-and-coming appellation in the future.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)